Places

About
Foundation
Partner Schools
Places Wire
Print Archive
Peer Review
Submissions
Donate
Contact


Departments

Critique
Essays
Gallery
Interviews
Multimedia
Partner News
Peer Reviewed
Poetry & Fiction
Projects


Topics

Architecture
Art
Books
Cities / Places
Community
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Infrastructure
Landscape
Literature
Photography
Planning
Politics / Policy
Preservation
Public / Private
Reputations
Sustainability
Technology
Transportation
Urbanism
Water



Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Comments Posted 08.21.12 | PERMALINK | PRINT | VIEW SLIDESHOW

Gallery: Aaron Rothman, Bryan Graf, Christina Seely, Kirsten Kay Thoen & Letha Wilson

Landscape Photography: New Visions, Part 4


This August, Places is featuring a five-part series on currents in landscape photography. Previously, Aaron Rothman examined The Idea of Landscape, Image, Object, Experience; and Our Invisible Presence. This fourth installment focuses on Natural Artifice and Artificial Nature. For the final installment, see Everyday Spaces and Natural Places.


Letha Wilson, “Easter Appalachian Trail,” 2010.

Can we draw a meaningful distinction between the natural and the artificial in an era of climate intervention and microbial engineering? The categorical line between the stuff of nature and the stuff of people has always been blurry; as the poet Gary Snyder observes, “There has been no wilderness without some kind of human presence for several hundred thousand years.” [1] And yet we seem to have entered a genuinely new period in our relationship with the planet and in our power to affect the processes of natural systems. Some contend that we have even entered a new geologic era, the Anthropocene. How do we come to terms with this new reality? Do we let go of the idea of nature entirely? Do we incorporate our interventions into a new definition of what is natural — the “next nature” posited by futurist Bruce Sterling and others?

Today no survey of landscape photography can ignore the changing definition of nature in the early 21st century. The work presented here expands the idea of what is natural — and what can be considered beautiful about natural landscapes — to include the effects of technological transformations and other human interventions, impositions and traces.




Bryan Graf — like Matthew Brandt and Chris McCaw, whose work I considered earlier this month — uses the photographic process to manifest qualities of the landscape that are difficult or impossible to convey through straight photography. For his project Wildlife Analysis, Graf, who lives in Maine and New Jersey, photographed sites in New Jersey that have been abandoned because they are environmentally polluted or otherwise inconvenient to develop. These landscapes, he says, are “determined by random dereliction, the discarded debris of our culture grafting itself into the landscape and nature refusing to stop doing its own work.” [2] In photographing these sites, Graf has exposed the film to incidental light leaks, creating obstructive blotches and strange, shifting colors overlaid on the images. We are denied the traditional beauty we expect from the landscape, but this marring of the images creates an unexpectedly organic beauty of its own.



Left: Bryan Graf, “Butterfly 14,” 2011. [Courtesy of the artist and Yancey Richardson Gallery, New York] Right: Kirsten Kay Thoen, “Arboreal Prism,” 2009.

Letha Wilson, a photographer raised in Colorado and living in New York, clearly has an affinity for wilderness landscapes of the West, and her work begins in a traditional, almost reverential mode. But she physically manipulates her photographs — cutting and folding them, marking them with spray paint, pouring concrete over them, integrating them into the architecture of a gallery — to create an experience between the imaged space of the photograph and the actual space occupied by the viewer. A surface of real concrete echoes photographs of rock formations. The undulating curve of a print woven through a gallery wall mimics the slot canyon it pictures. Just as we are not sure where the photograph ends and the object or architecture begins, we find it hard to distinguish what in these works represents the natural world and what is constructed. We also wonder how much that distinction matters.

Kirsten Kay Thoen
is a maker of objects incorporating photographs of the natural world which, at first glance, appear to follow recent trends in hip furniture and interior design. (That she is from Brooklyn only heightens the comparison.) But unlike some designers and crafters, whose use of nature imagery is merely decorative, driven by ironic wit or easy sentiment, Thoen’s works are designed around photographs of nature, often enclosed completely within a prism or frame. The relationship between image and object is enigmatic. Do these works conjure nature’s primal power, containing it symbolically, as talismans? Or do they suggest that nature itself has become the symbol, emptied of its power in a world circumscribed by our presence?



Christina Seely, “Metropolis 40°25' N 3°41' W (Madrid).” From Lux, 2005–2010.

Several artists featured earlier in this series focused on light as an elemental power of nature. Christina Seely, a photographer based in San Francisco, also takes light as her subject, but hers is the light of the built environment. For her project Lux, Seely has traveled the world, following NASA maps of the most brightly lit metropolitan areas and photographing each city at night, glowing with light pollution. The illumination of our cities is perhaps the most visible sign of our presence on the planet, a visual correlate of the invisible emissions generated in the process of energizing our cities. Bright enough that they could almost be daytime scenes, the landscapes in Seely’s photographs are familiar, but strange and unsettling. This is the world as we’ve made it — changed, likely unsustainable, but also beautiful.

— Aaron Rothman



Notes

1. Gary Snyder, The Practice of the Wild (San Francisco: North Point Press, 1990) 7. See also William Cronon, “The Trouble with Wilderness,” Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature (New York: Norton, 1995) 69-90.

2. Email to the author.

Editors’ Note

Bryan Graf's work is currently on view at the DeCordova Museum and Sculpture Park, in the exhibition Second Nature: Abstract Photography Then and Now, through April 21, 2013. Graf's book, Wildlife Analysis, will be published by Conveyor Arts this Fall. He is represented by Yancey Richardson Gallery, New York.

Christina Seely's project Lux will be published as a monograph by the Museum of Contemporary Photography (Chicago) in spring 2013.
Share This Story

RELATED POSTS


A Mound in the Wood


Landscape Photography: New Visions


Please Save Modernism from the Modern


If There Be Such Space


Visualizing the Ends of Oil



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




Donate to Places: Your Support Makes Our Work Possible



ABOUT THE SLIDESHOW

Works by Bryan Graf, Christina Seely, Kirsten Kay Thoen and Letha Wilson representing new directions in landscape photography.
View Slideshow >>

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Aaron Rothman’s photographs, video and installation artwork explore perceptual experience of space in both natural and built environments.
More Bio >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS









MORE BY Aaron Rothman

02.18.14: Landscape Forensics
12.09.13: Life of the Party
09.12.13: Landscape and Illusion
07.18.13: Resurveying the West
05.23.13: Barranca
05.02.13: Expect Everything
03.28.13: Blind Views
12.06.12: Above Lake Las Vegas
12.03.12: Detroit, As Is
09.06.12: Storm Season
More by Aaron Rothman >>