Places

About
Foundation
Partner Schools
Print Archive
Peer Review
Submissions
Donate
Contact


Departments

Critique
Essays
Gallery
Interviews
Multimedia
Partner News
Peer Reviewed
Poetry & Fiction
Projects


Topics

Architecture
Art
Books
Cities + Places
Community
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Film + Video
Food
Geography
Health + Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Infrastructure
Landscape
Photography
Planning
Politics + Policy
Preservation
Public + Private
Reputations
Sustainability
Technology
Transportation
Urbanism
Water



Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact




Gallery: Christine Macy

Dams Across America


Hoover Dam, workers along spillway.

Dams are a monumental presence on the American landscape. They divert and restrain mighty rivers that have run for millennia. They impound vast artificial lakes. Water from dams has turned deserts into orchards, slaked the thirst of millions of metropolitan citizens, and powered wartime production from the Southeast to the Northwest; but dams have also prevented salmon from spawning, flooded forests and fields, displaced populations, and required graves to be exhumed. It is not surprising, then, that dam building inspires powerful emotions.

Most people, when asked about American dams, think of one of the massive federal projects built between the 1930s and the 1970s, such as Hoover Dam or the Grand Coulee. Yet according to the National Research Council, there are over 2.5 million dams in the United States, most of which are small, privately owned structures. [1] Only a very small number — six thousand, to be precise — are large dams over 50 feet high, and only a small portion of these have been built by the federal government. [2] It is a bit daunting, then, to present a picture of dams across America. Which dams should one talk about? The most typical or the most exceptional ones? The structurally innovative, politically contentious, or newsworthy ones? The exemplary, influential, or precedent-setting ones?

Histories of engineering talk about dams in superlatives. They are the longest, highest, or most massive; they have the biggest reservoir or the highest head drop (distance from the reservoir surface to the powerhouse), or they were made with the least or the most amount of material. They were the first or the latest to set records in any of these ways. Dams imply a kind of engineering Olympics, a measure of people against nature. Like that other great technological achievement, the skyscraper, one can always build a bigger dam. Certainly, the biggest dams in the United States were colossal undertakings that took years to complete. The architectural critic Lewis Mumford called them "democratic pyramids" and compared them to the greatest constructions of antiquity. [3] The cultural historian David Nye suggests that because dams inspire feelings of awe, they engender national pride. [4] If newspaper coverage is any measure, this would certainly seem to be the case with the dams that span the great rivers of the country, like Hoover Dam across the Colorado, the Grand Coulee Dam across the Columbia, and Fort Peck Dam across the Missouri.




But the history of dam design is a history of invention and development that proceeded by trial and error in some cases, and by calculation and engineering in others. It is an iterative process in which each new design incorporates lessons from an earlier, similar dam. Dam design has to take into account precedents, engineering science, and the specific circumstances of site and construction process — such as whether the labor force is large or small, whether the ground conditions are solid or porous, and whether it is easy or difficult to get construction materials to the site.

In social terms, dams have always held the promise of using technology to harness nature for the benefit of people. This dream is perhaps best exemplified by the dams of the Tennessee Valley Authority. Yet today, dams are a much-maligned, even vilified, presence in the country’s western landscapes. They are criticized as destroyers of animal habitats, usurpers of native lands, boondoggles for land speculators, or subsidies for wealthy farmers. Yet ranchers, farmers, industrialists, unions, municipalities, states, and federal agencies have all, over the years, vied energetically for federal support in dam building, because dams require a huge mobilization of capital, manpower, and resources. And they have similarly huge effects, both desirable and collateral.


Credits


Excerpted from Dams. Copyright © 2010 by Library of Congress, © 2010 by Christine Macy. With permission of the publisher, W.W Norton & Company, Inc.

Notes

1. National Research Council, Committee on Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy, Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992), 26.

2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Inventory of Dams, revised 2001.

3. Lewis Mumford, "The Architecture of Power," New Yorker (June 7, 1941), 58.

4. David E. Nye, American Technological Sublime (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994).
Share This Story

RELATED POSTS


The Dying Sea


The Land Up North


Resurveying the West


Kampground, America


The New Public Landscapes of Governors Island: An Interview with Adriaan Geuze



RSSSubscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (2)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

The dams that either no longer exist or the ones that never existed are as interesting as the ones that do exist. On the upper Delaware River, for example, is an almost spooky place where the land was depopulated in order to create the Tocks Island Dam -- which never materialized. Now it's an area of empty, decaying houses, eternally fallow fields and a sense of place that is almost ghostly. At least it was that way last time I went through there in the nineties!
Bill Tracy
01.25.10 at 04:43

David Nye, in "Consuming Power," also emphasizes a more fundamental basis for the American relationship with dams: from the eighteenth to the early twentieth centuries they provided industrial-scale direct power, which had been much rarer in the mother country. The productive collision of topography and hydrology in New England remade the region's entire urban landscape into one of mill towns and the cities that channeled their production, a process of dispersed urbanization that was later repeated in the Southeast. In this context the symbolic transformation of the dam from a private construction powering a factory to a public megaproject feeding a regional network of power seems jarring, if not radical.
Ian Baldwin
01.29.10 at 03:53



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




Donate to Places: Your Support Makes Our Work Possible



ABOUT THE SLIDESHOW

Photographs of several of America's great dams — Hoover, Grand Coulee and two that are part of the Tennessee Valley Authority — showing them not only completed but also under construction. All images are from the Prints and Photographs Division of the Library of Congress.
View Slideshow >>

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Christine Macy is dean of architecture and planning at Dalhousie University.
More Bio >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS